Cross-product verification dispositions.

This launch-readiness review decides how concepts, diagrams, mental models, review levels, security language, examples, community, operations, privacy, observability, roadmap, and freeze-checklist pages keep or bound Verification Required labels before final launch acceptance.

Decision Snapshot

Route groups: 11
Source groups: 6
Sensitive lanes: 5
P0/P1 blockers: 0
Tooling lanes open: 1

Route Dispositions

Cross-product route Verification Required decisions
Route or surface	Current exposure	Disposition	Rationale	Review basis
System map and diagram	Product-role map, inline diagram, and conceptual integration lanes under Verification Required.	Accept with limits	The route says conceptual adjacency is not runtime integration and sends readers to product pages, compatibility rows, limits, and status before strengthening claims.	Review records
Product mental models	Product-specific nouns and reading paths with mixed product maturity.	Accept with limits	The page prevents readers from moving terms like bucket, replay, placement, or segment across products without the owning product page and evidence.	Review records
Durability and review levels	Review vocabulary for local, durable, committed, replicated, preview, and reviewer-held claims.	Accept with limits	The route explains what evidence proves and what it does not prove, so durability, replication, support, and availability claims stay bounded.	Review records
Tenancy and security concepts	Tenant, dataset, auth mode, bearer token, trusted-header, and current-gap definitions.	Accept with security and privacy limits	The page keeps identity, privacy, compliance, support, hosted identity, and customer credential wording in review and names product-specific evidence.	Review records
Diagram accessibility	Diagram review standards and accessible text-equivalent expectations.	Accept with limits	The page makes diagrams safer by requiring text equivalents and claim boundaries; it does not create product behavior.	Review records
Example strategy and validation	Example status policy, source layout, validation checks, and review triggers.	Accept with limits	Example pages separate tested, manually verified, illustrative, and future examples before readers rely on snippets as product proof.	Review records
Community support snapshot	Illustrative cross-product support intake scenario with product roles and redacted sample shapes.	Accept with limits	The route uses synthetic identifiers, keeps product maturity labels visible, and states it is not a runnable workflow, support platform, integration test, or product commitment.	Review records
Troubleshooting and observability audit	Symptom-led runbook routing, evidence classification, and support handoff language.	Accept with operations limits	These routes help readers choose first checks while avoiding incident-response, support response-time, availability, or remediation promises.	Review records
Support, privacy, feedback, and legal routes	Customer-safe data handling, support intake, feedback, and docs-use boundaries.	Accept with privacy/legal limits	The pages route readers away from raw payloads, credentials, private topology, unsupported support promises, and unapproved analytics/cookie behavior.	Review records
Launch operations	Docs launch watch, CDN rollback, dependency audit, and remediation posture.	Accept with release limits	The routes describe docs release operations and accepted-risk review without turning launch watch or dependency evidence into product readiness claims.	Review records
Community, roadmap, changelog, and freeze routes	Contribution flow, issue templates, style guidance, governance, content freeze, roadmap, changelog, QA, triage, and review pages.	Accept with limits	These routes are public-safe planning and contribution surfaces; response targets and roadmap language stay scoped to docs work rather than product delivery or support commitments.	Review records

Source Note Dispositions

Cross-product source-note posture
Source group	Current exposure	Disposition	Rationale
Concepts and diagrams	Source notes for system map, mental models, review levels, tenancy/security, and diagram accessibility use Verification Required to hold broad cross-product claims.	Accept with limits	These notes keep conceptual guidance useful while preventing diagrams, nouns, or review levels from implying product-wide maturity.
Example strategy and cross-product examples	Example source notes and manifests classify example status, rendered pages, evidence, and review checks.	Accept with limits	The source model supports customer-friendly examples by making tested, manual, illustrative, and future status explicit.
Operations and support review details	Runbook template, observability audit, troubleshooting index, and support-bundle privacy source notes use the label for operational safety and data-handling review.	Accept with operations/privacy limits	The notes require redaction, review-note links, reviewer routing, and stop conditions before stronger support or remediation wording is published.
Community contribution system	Contributor guide, issue templates, style guide, good-first-docs, and governance source notes keep contribution paths issue-first and claim-safe.	Accept with limits	The pages give contributors clear next steps without public source-edit links, private repository paths, or unreviewed product claims.
Roadmap, freeze, and launch decision records	Roadmap source notes, content freeze, changelog, launch QA, post-launch triage, public feedback, and launch-readiness decisions keep launch-review language explicit.	Accept with release limits	The records describe docs launch governance and accepted-risk workflow without becoming product roadmap, GA, support, or legal commitments.
Privacy, legal, analytics, assets, and SEO review notes	Launch privacy, cookie, footer, external asset, strict-link, and SEO source notes keep public route and data-handling boundaries visible.	Accept with limits	The source notes keep production docs behavior reviewable while leaving final environment samples and owner signoff to review record.

Customer-Friendly Language Rules

Rules for keeping cross-product pages reader-safe
Rule	Required behavior before launch
Start with the reader task	Cross-product pages should say whether they help readers choose, compare, troubleshoot, contribute, report, or review.
Keep product truth local	Product-specific pages remain the source of truth for current runtime behavior, maturity, limits, and evidence.
Name what the page does not prove	Concepts, diagrams, examples, and operations pages must state when they are not runtime integration, support, security, durability, availability, performance, scale, compliance, or GA proof.
Protect sensitive details	Support and operations routes must keep credentials, customer identifiers, payloads, raw telemetry, private topology, and proprietary logs out of public examples.
Route stronger claims	Any stronger support, security, privacy, legal, durability, availability, scale, performance, or product-commitment wording needs the named reviewer before publication.

Launch Blocking Rules

Cross-product blocker rules for final launch acceptance
Severity	Condition	Required action
P0	A cross-product route exposes private source paths, credentials, customer data, raw payloads, private topology, unpublished internal systems, or unsafe support review details.	Remove the exposure before launch review continues.
P1	A concept, example, operations, support, legal, privacy, community, roadmap, or freeze page implies product readiness, runtime integration, support coverage, security/privacy posture, durability, availability, performance, scale, compliance, or GA status that product pages do not support.	Review record
P2	A cross-product page keeps Verification Required because it aggregates mixed product maturity, reviewer workflow, privacy/safety rules, launch operations, or illustrative examples while nearby copy names the boundary.	Accept with limits and keep the owner or review-note path visible.
P3	Source notes, README, generated manifests, project-management records, or automation mention the label as taxonomy or review process.	Review record

Remaining Boundaries

Review record

Still owns

Frontmatter, templates, compatibility row taxonomy, search/status source models, icons, validators, generated metadata, and automation fixtures.

Review record

Still owns

Exact build, reviewer signoffs, accepted risks, launch watch, environment samples, and go/no-go decision.